What happens when therapy seeks to fix rather than integrate our wounds? How does Jung’s view of individuation challenge affirmative models in gender care? Can mythic imagination, as Michael Mead suggests, restore meaning where literalism prevails?
The recent Beyond Gender podcast discussion with Erin Friday, hosted by Stella O’Malley, offers an unflinching look at the lived reality of parents navigating gender identity crises with their children. Erin’s story is searing: the sudden onset of gender distress, the coercive messaging from schools, and the loneliness of resisting a tide of affirmation. Yet beyond its urgency lies an opportunity to place these experiences in a deeper psychological and mythological frame—one that Carl Jung and mythologist Michael Mead can help us illuminate.
The Limits of Fixing: Wounds Are Not Errors
Central to Erin and Stella’s exchange is the question of what therapy should do. Stella critiques the prevailing therapeutic orthodoxy of unconditional affirmation, describing it as “placing the relationship above everything” even when the ideology driving the child’s distress remains unchallenged. She likens this approach to enabling addiction: “You don’t treat anorexia or addiction by colluding with the disorder. You set boundaries.” Erin echoes this with striking clarity: “There’s a difference between loving your child and setting boundaries. You can have both.”
Here, Jung provides a powerful counterpoint to the affirmative model’s fixation on comfort as cure:
“We do not cure by taking away symptoms, but by helping the patient acquire a wider outlook on life.” (CW 16, Practice of Psychotherapy)
Jung understood that psychic wounds are not meaningless malfunctions to be excised. They are attempts by the psyche to restore balance, and therefore cannot be solved by erasing pain or pandering to its expression. As he famously observed:
“There is no coming to consciousness without pain. People will do anything, no matter how absurd, to avoid facing their own soul.” (CW 9i)
Therapy’s role is not to collude with illusion but to enable a confrontation with the unconscious, to bring its contents into dialogue with consciousness. This is slow, often agonising work—what Stella calls standing on “sacred ground,” the parental stance of love combined with immovable reality. It contrasts sharply with what Erin calls “child-led therapy,” where authority collapses and adults outsource discernment to adolescent self-definition.
Affirmation and Its Shadow: One-Sided Thinking
Erin repeatedly refers to the current phenomenon as a “mind virus” and a “social contagion,” noting the dramatic spike in adolescent females identifying as male. While this metaphor captures the speed and spread of gender ideology, it risks flattening the psychic complexity beneath the trend. Jung would urge us to look deeper: such mass phenomena are rarely random. They are often symptoms of a collective neurosis, erupting when a culture has lost its symbolic orientation.
“When an inner situation is not made conscious, it happens outside as fate.” (CW 9ii, Aion)
The gender identity crisis, then, may not be reducible to peer imitation or internet influence. It is a projection of unintegrated psychic content into the social sphere—a desperate attempt to literalise inner ambiguity through bodily alteration. Michael Mead’s insight resonates here:
“When the common world is making less and less sense, mythology makes more sense.” (Living Myth Podcast 446)
In Mead’s framing, a culture caught in “spells of literalism and materialism” neglects the mythic dimension of experience—that third realm beyond logic and even psychology, where meaning is born from paradox and imagination. In the absence of mythic imagination, the longing for transformation collapses into its crudest form: the scalpel, the hormone, the fantasy of rebirth in flesh.
The Myth We Refuse: From Fixing to Meaning
Erin’s account of her daughter’s despair—believing “she was born wrong, her mom is a bigot, and she will commit suicide”—illustrates Jung’s warning that archetypal energies, when denied symbolic expression, become literal and lethal. The adolescent dream of metamorphosis is not pathological in itself; it is a classic theme of myth and individuation. But when a culture lacks symbolic containers—rites of passage, imaginative education, spaces for ambiguity—such energies seize the body.
Jung saw the task of therapy as restoring this symbolic function:
“The symbol is the best possible expression for something unknown. To reduce it to something known is to empty it of its living meaning.” (CW 6, Psychological Types)
In gender medicine, this reduction is stark: fantasies of fluidity and wholeness, instead of being interpreted as psychic metaphors, are taken as surgical mandates. The mythic becomes the medical. What might have been integrated into personality is externalised as irreversible bodily harm.
Sacred Ground and the Courage to Confront
Stella calls parental resolve “sacred ground,” and the phrase feels Jungian. Sacred ground is where opposites meet—love and authority, empathy and limit. Jung termed this the “transcendent function”: holding tension without premature resolution, allowing a third thing—a creative solution—to emerge. In therapy, as in parenting, this requires courage to confront rather than comfort, to resist the modern idolatry of “fixing.”
Mead offers a parallel image: the youngest sibling in fairy tales, dismissed as foolish yet bearing the genius of renewal. Our culture, obsessed with the “oldest brothers” of logic and medical control, has exiled its youngest part—the mythic dreamer. Yet:
“Just at the point where it all seems lost, like in a fairy tale, something unexpected, something imaginative, something divine tries to come in.” (Living Myth 446)
To allow this, therapists and parents alike must reclaim imagination as a healing force—not as fantasy enacted on flesh, but as depth integrated into soul.
The Duty of the Healer
The podcast closes with Erin warning that “there is no playbook” and Stella lamenting therapy’s abdication of discernment. Jung would not be surprised. A culture that denies psyche will inevitably medicalise mystery and politicise pain. Yet his admonition remains:
“The principal aim of analysis is not to transport the patient to an impossible state of happiness, but to help him acquire steadfastness and philosophic patience in face of suffering.” (CW 16)
In other words: the healer’s task is not to fix, but to deepen; not to erase wounds, but to help the soul grow around them. To heal is to midwife meaning.
Toward a New Imagination
What Erin and Stella testify to—through tears, defiance, and hard-won clarity—is that real love does not capitulate to illusion. Real therapy, likewise, does not confuse affirmation with integration. If gender identity ideology reveals anything, it is that a culture without myth must invent myths in grotesque literal forms. Our task is to re-open the symbolic imagination before the scalpel closes it forever.
Perhaps Mead’s words say it best:
“When the world seems lost, it is usually mythic sense that is missing.”
And Jung adds the corollary:
“Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life, and you will call it fate.”
The question is whether we will meet this collective neurosis with more one-sided fixes—or with the courage to hold sacred ground, confront the unconscious, and let the deeper story come through.
Leave a Reply